International online discussion lists on chronic myelogenous leukaemia.

1 Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group. BMJ 1998;317:465-8. 2 Grol R. Improving the quality of medical care. Building bridges among professional pride, payer profit and patient satisfaction. JAMA 2001;286:2578-85. 3 Needham G. Research and practice: making a difference. In: Gomm R, ed.Using evidence in health and social care. London: Sage, 2000. 4 Wyatt JC. Management of explicit and tacit knowledge. J R Soc Med 2001;94:6-9. 5 Guba E, Lincoln Y. Fourth generation evaluation. London: Sage, 1989. 6 Kushner S. The limits of constructivism in evaluation. Evaluation 1996;2:189-200. 7 Patton M.Utilization-focused evaluation. London: Sage, 1997. 8 Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, Dillon L. Quality in qualitative evaluation: a framework for assessing research evidence. London: Cabinet Office, 2003. 9 Parlett M, Hamilton D. Evaluation as illumination: a new approach to the study of innovatory programmes. In: Hamilton D, ed. Beyond the numbers game: a reader in educational evaluation. London: Macmillan, 1972. 10 Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The knowledge creation company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford, 1995. 11 Ferlie E, Gabbay J, Fitzgerald L, Locock L, Dopson S. Evidence-based medicine and organisational change: an overview of some recent qualitative research. In: Ashburner L, ed. Organisational behaviour and organisational studies in health care: reflections on the future, Basingstoke: Palgrove, 2001. 12 Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation.Organ Sci 1994;5:14-37. 13 Bate SP, Robert G. Knowledge management and communities of practice in the private sector: lessons for modernizing the NHS in England and Wales. Public Admin 2002;80:643-63. 14 Edwards N. Clinical networks: a discussion paper. London: NHS Federation, 2001. 15 Fenton E, Harvey J, Griffiths F, Wild A, Sturt J. Reflections from organization science on the development of primary health care research networks. Fam Pract 2001;18:540-4. 16 Urquhart C, Yeoman A, Sharp S. NeLH Communities of practice evaluation report, 2002. Department of Information Studies, University of Wales Aberystwyth. www.nhsia.nhs.uk/nelh/pages/documents/cop.doc (accessed 28 Apr 2004). 17 Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 1973;78:1360-80. 18 Wenger E. Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 19 Nonnecke B, Preece J. Silent participants: getting to know lurkers better. In: Lueg C, Fisher D, eds. From Usenet to CoWebs: interacting with social information spaces. London: Springer, 2002.